a     monthly     alternative     community     newsletter     serving     Free     Speech     in     Venice     California                    
April
2007 21st Edition     Archives        Message Board        Blog         For information or to submit material please Email us
      SAVE VENICE BOARDWALK FROM GREEDY DEVELOPERS
Want to support this website? Make
your tax-deductible
donation here: 

VIDEO AND PHOTOS
Arlington West
Dogg Daze
Graffiti Gallery
SOV Photo Gallery

POP-TV has a new
Cable TV Internship
See Buddy Clark
to Sign up for free
Media Internships
310-266-9465

Fax 310-401-0274
email
COOL  LINKS
Anti-War Radio
Current TV
Deep Eddy
1st Amendment
Free Press
Free Speech Radio
Free Speech TV
Hotmall
VENICE BEACH
About Us Now
Beachhead
Beach Cam
Councilmember
Drum Circle
GRVNC
History
Hostels
Rec & Parks
SOV Blog
SOV Petition
SOV News Group
Surf Report
Venice Forum
Venice Paper

Two Venice Streets Get Solar Streetlights

by Vince Echavaria
Residents living on two streets in Venice say they have the sun to thank for making their neighborhood a little bit brighter at night.

Victoria and Coeur d'Alene Avenues, both within the Presidents Row Neighborhood of Venice, are the two locations where new solar-powered street lights have recently been installed as part of a pilot program of the Los Angeles City Bureau of Street Lighting.

The street lights, which stand at 609 Victoria Ave. and 811 Coeur d'Alene Ave., are composed of a solar panel that collects energy from the sun during the day and a battery that stores the energy until it is used to power the lights between dusk and dawn each day, said Harris Levey, member of the Presidents Row Neighborhood Assn. in Venice.

"We can harness the power of the sun to light our streets and improve safety without using any other resources," Levey said.

In the event that there is no sunlight on a certain day, the system's battery has the capacity to store enough solar energy to power the lights for a few days.

The two Venice streets are currently the only residential locations in Los Angeles where a solar street light has been installed, said Norma Isahakian, city Bureau of Street Lighting assistant director. The only other location in Los Angeles with a functioning solar street light is on the San Fernando bicycle path, Isahakian said.

Six solar street lights have been installed in the City of Santa Monica.  Members of the Venice Presidents Row Neighborhood Association say they worked for nearly four years to get the solar lights installed in their neighborhood and had the support of the office of former City Councilwoman Cindy Miscikowski, whose office provided grant money for the program. The residents praised the addition of the new lights to their street, calling them an improvement for safety.

"We are so happy with our light," said Presidents Row Neighborhood  Assn. member Lindsey Folsom, who lives on Victoria Avenue.

Folsom said she helped begin the effort to acquire the solar lights as a way to improve safety on neighborhood streets, particularly at night. Some residential streets in the area tend to be dark at night and residents wanted to brighten up the streets to make them safer, she said.

Levey said a main reason the streets are darker than many others is that Presidents Row is an old neighborhood of Venice, where street lights are far apart.

Residents knew they wanted more street lights, but instead of installing something that would use more electricity, they decided to take advantage of a source that is plentiful in Southern California — sunlight, Folsom said.

"Why not make use of a natural resource that we've got here?" Folsom said.

Solar street lights not only make use of an alternative energy source but are also expected to be more cost-effective than electric lights, Levey said.  The solar lights are also cheaper to install and can lead to some environmental benefits, Isahakian said.  The lights were installed by two separate vendors, SOL (Solar Outdoor Lighting) for the Victoria Avenue site and BioProduct for the Coeur d'Alene site.

Isahakian said city street lighting officials are pleased with how the Victoria Avenue light has been operating, but the Coeur d'Alene light has had difficulty staying on for as long the other.  City street lighting officials say they plan to study the effectiveness of the lights before considering installation at other parts of the city.  But Presidents Row Assn. members say they are confident that their neighborhood lights will serve as a benchmark for future solar street lighting projects in the city.

© The Argonaut

 
 

Open Letter to Mayor Villaraigosa

by the Spirit of Venice

We, the undersigned, demand the immediate resignation of Mark Brown from the office of the City Attorney.  Mark Brown (Bar # 60683), during the course of the last three years, has taken a central role in writing ordinances that unfairly oppress and harass hardworking people of the city of Los Angeles. Most recently, he has made great attempts to destroy the Venice Beach Boardwalk, which is a historic site for the gathering of artists, performers and activists as a “free speech zone,” as well as a highly attended tourist destination.  In the wake of the first lottery system, passed by the city council on October 2004, most of what remained on the Boardwalk was commercial vending – the very opposite of what the city should advocate.  The outcome was unacceptable.  Mark Brown's law literally chased away the artists and activists and made the Boardwalk a breeding ground for commercial vending.  In his second attempt – to “fix the nightmare he had created – he and his associates have re-written the ordinance with only minor adjustments that do not meet the expectations of first amendment advocates. He has placed limitations on “noise,” yet unequally enforces them – building developers make far more noise in construction than any performer ever could.  In addition, outspoken activists are being ticketed for displaying political language and simply for standing outside the “regulated” lines!  We can longer shout our messages to the public!  All of these are citable offences!   Is Venice Beach a prison or a “free speech zone?”  At this point, it is hard to decipher the difference.

In a public forum about the Venice Beach ordinance, Mark Brown professed to the crowd that he has never been to Venice Beach and has no desire to ever come (we can provide video documentation if necessary).  We, the concerned citizens of the Venice Beach Boardwalk, demand to know how a person with such a perspective could attain the position of writing a law that affects the outcome of the very community he despises.  We hold Mark Brown directly accountable for wasting city resources and harassing people who are working hard to make an honest living.  We hold him directly accountable for damaging and potentially destroying one of the city of Los Angeles' most exciting historic locations.  We believe that Mark Brown's actions and intentions speak to what is evil about the political process.  When he and his associates first began writing the ordinances, the Venice Beach vendors and supporters asked repeatedly in front of the city council, with you as a council member and witness, to engage in mediation instead of regulation of the Boardwalk.  No mediation was ever sought out!  No compromises were ever made!  While dialogue and public forums were offered, not one of the suggestions made by the Venice Beach vendors was taken seriously and implemented into the ordinance.  Instead, Mark Brown spearheaded an agenda to bring down the Venice Beach Boardwalk.  There is a growing contradiction between the opinions of the people and those with legal authority.  If this is encouraged, it will certainly cast a dark shadow over your administration.   This contradiction speaks loudly to who the law benefits.  We believe that Mark Brown is working in the interests of a few developers who would like to destroy the Venice Beach Boardwalk, while at the same time harassing some of the most outspoken and politically active citizens in order to attain this very end. Mayor Villaraigosa, we supported you in your election campaign, and we now demand that you support us in bringing an end to Mark Brown's reign of terror against the Venice Beach Boardwalk.  Sincerely, The Spirit of Venice

ACTION ALERT - TAKE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD BACK!

Residents oppose the expansion of the Other Room ( a noisy bar at San Juan and Abbot Kinney Blvd. They believe they have a really good chance of fighting this expansion and need community support with letters and showing up at the hearing.

Help stop The Other Room Bar from expanding hours and capacity they are appealing their declined request for:
1. Hour expansion from 2PM to 2AM
2. Sidewalk outdoor seating
3. Expanding Indoor seating

3 THINGS YOU CAN DO TO STOP THE BAR FROM EXPANDING!

1) zoning case # ZA-2006-8310-CUB-1A - Make calls & publicly register complaints against Other Room

2) When you hear excessive noise call the police dept at 877-ASK-LAPD.  All phone calls go into the Other Room's file and will further support the denial of their expansion.  If you are affected by the noise, loitering, and any late night issues, call and voice them to LAPD

3) Attend the meeting and voice your concerns!


Wednesday, April 18   4:30 pm
Henry Medina West LA
Parking Enforcement Facility 2nd FL
11214 West Exposition Blvd.  90064
Nearest Cross Sts: Off Sepulveda, 1 Block South of Pico

Public Opinion voiced at this hearing will demonstrate how strong our concerns are for protecting the quality of life of our neighborhood.  The quality of our neighborhood life is in jeopardy.  This is the final appeal for The Other Room Expansion.  Your involvement is critical now!

<*> <*> <*> <*>

Community Meeting Report for March 28, 2007

by Taimie Bryant

A brief report about the neighborhood meeting that was held on Wednesday, March 28th (2007) at the Penmar Recreation Center. Topics included a brief review of the current situation at St. Joseph’s, the increasingly heavy traffic on Walgrove, the high volume of idling diesel tandem trucks on Lincoln Blvd and residential streets that connect to Lincoln, the current situation with the house at which drug-dealing was allegedly taking place, and the proposed design requirements for commercial establishments on Lincoln Blvd. I hope that attendance will increase at future meetings because a lot of valuable information can be obtained from speakers and from each other as we come together to solve problems and get to know one another. Mark Grant, who is Councilman Rosendahl’s deputy in charge of this part of the Council District 11, reported that, as of yesterday, St. Joseph’s is still responding to the Department of Building and Safety’s review of their permit for changed use. Mr. Grant said that he had no further information at this time but that a meeting is being planned to provide further information and opportunities for discussion. He invited us—whether favorably inclined towards the Center or unfavorably inclined—to let the Councilman know what our thoughts are. Mark Grant can be e-mailed at mark.grant@lacity.org  More

 

<*> <*> <*> <*>

$$$  THE FED RIPOFF! by W. George E.K. French

When the Federal Reserve Act was railroaded through Congress at eleven thirty Christmas Eve, 1913, a truly huge amount of money had been spent by certain private banks to push the legislation through.  Every member of Congress present had been bought and paid for by those banks. Since this all happened, as the banks fully expected, trillions of dollars have been guzzled by them, at the expense of all our people.  The idea that ANY nation should have to employ private banks to distribute the bills and coinage produced by the government owned mints is pure insanity.  For these banks to charge full face value of the bills and coinage they manufacture, plus a very high rate of interest for allowing the citizens to use them, is more madness.  It doesn't stop there, however.  For this incredible thievery to have continued until the present day is almost beyond belief.  Nevertheless, it has.  The private corporation chartered by the banks, named the Internal Revenue Service, continues to wage its financial war against our people every day.  Most of our people think, wrongly, that the IRS  is part of the government.  IT ISN'T.  The IRS, in its reign of terror,  has caused more suicides, divorces, bankruptcies, foreclosures and homeless beggars than any other thing.  This millstone around the necks of our people is a hideous and criminal enterprise, brought into being by bribery and maintained by more collusion, bribery, blackmail and murder. 

Why has this institution continued to this day?  Why should our people be hoodwinked into thinking it is a legitimate part of our government, and that they are unpatriotic if they don't pay what the bandits running this racket demand? The answer is ignorance.  The whole IRS thing has always been shrouded in secrecy, cloaked in fear, and enforced by Judges whose rulings have been bought by the perpetrators of this vicious system.  The tax lawyers, accountants, tax preparers and so forth, are all part of the problem.  They all treat the tax as though it was mandatory as well as legitimate.  Of course they do, for it is their bread and butter, their livelihood.  The last thing that any of them would want is for it to go away.  It gives them all a good living. When the tax lawyer or the accountant tells you that you should go ahead and pay the IRS when you are sent a notice saying you've been penalized five hundred bucks, it is a damned lie.  No IRS agent has the right or authority to penalize anyone.  Before you can be penalized there must be a trial, and if you demand it (and ONLY if you demand it, see the Seventh Amendment), a jury trial of your peers, a guilty verdict and a court order.  Without these things, you cannot legally be fined, penalized, garnisheed, levied against or anything else. No IRS agent can issue a levy, a garnishment, or a fine.  Only the courts can do that.

 Unfortunately, most people don't know this.  They think the IRS can do all this stuff at will.  The lawyer and the CPA all tell them to pay the penalty and then, of course, bill the poor sucker for the rotten advice they have just given.  They don't tell their clients about “rogue” letters and notices, which lack an OMB number and expiration date or have a rubber stamp having instead of an actual human signature.  Instead, they give their “expert” advice, bill the poor ignorant fool for it, and smile all the way to the bank.  These people have a “stock in trade.”  They continually profit from the public's ignorance.  Why do you think the laws are so confusing?  So that we will have to pay some lawyer to take us through them.  Lawyers make some marvelous living from our ignorance.  Why do you suppose that the Founding Fathers wrote the original  Thirteenth Amendment – the one that was conveniently “lost” shortly after the Civil war?  It was never legally repealed; it was on every copy of the Constitutional Amendments for more than eighty years, and then, all of a sudden, it was replaced by a completely different Thirteenth Amendment.  The original Thirteenth Amendment said that no attorney who was a member of a bar association could hold public office.  It also said that no one could hold any title or special privilege that would set him above the rest of us.  These were called emollients, and they were not allowed.  Needless to say, the replacement to this original Amendment said nothing about this.  Today, more than ninety percent of our Congressmen are lawyers and, of course, they are members of Bar Associations.  The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution are without any 'legalese” and were stated in very clear, plain English that everyone can read and understand.  Up until the time that original Thirteenth Amendment strangely disappeared and was replaced, the same thing was true for all other laws that were written.  Since the post Civil war switch, we have had hundreds of “Confuse-a-lawyers” muddying up the waters and making things as incomprehensible as possible. 

Just how did they get away with all of this?  Per usual, secrecy, bribery, blackmail, and greed.  The same thing holds true for the IRS crap.  People don't know that every dime they pay in “Income Tax” goes to the banks that make up the Fed.  They think their taxes go into the general fund.  They don't.  If people knew they every dime goes to the Fed Banks to pay that “face value plus interest” they charge for distributing our printed money and coinage to all of the other banks in this country, they might wonder why, and start asking some very embarrassing questions.  Do you think those privately owned banks that make up the Federal Reserve System would ever be willing to give up this marvelous system for bilking the American People out of untold billions of dollars EVERY year?  It is my belief that murders are done every year to protect their filthy racket.  The bankers cannot allow this information to become common knowledge, or of common interest to the bulk of our people.  They will do ANYTHING to protect themselves and their criminal enterprise.  There are a number of other facts that you might find of interest, regarding our beloved country, and the rotten, corrupt criminals who have consistently sold us down the river at every opportunity, for their own greedy benefit.  Stay tuned.  If they don't get me first, I'll fill you in on all sorts of lovely things that you should know and that the perpetrators are hoping you don't find out.  

©  George E.K. French

 

Luxury condos INSIDE a NYC Park by Robert Lederman
Some people think I'm making this stuff up about the parks and sidewalks being offered for sale...Hey, you can't make up anything as extreme as what they are actually doing and plan to do in the near future! All public property, including the sidewalks and Parks artists now freely sell on, will be offered for sale to the highest bidders. It will be used for advertising kiosks, corporate promotions, fast food stands and of all things, luxury condos! This is exactly why NYC officials so desperately want to get rid of street artists... our rights are the last vestige of free speech on the streets and in the public parks of NYC. © Robert Lederman


'We're going to cut a ribbon on a new park four times a week every week this year,' says City Parks Commissioner Adrian Benepe. Is that a good thing?
by John Koblin

Location: What's the value of living near a New York City park?

Benepe: I think it's the crucial factor for many people when choosing where they live and where they invest their money and develop. Soon after I became parks commissioner, I noticed in the real-estate sections, increasingly, how many of the ads focus on a park that is nearby or across the street rather than the building that they're advertising.

When you see these ads where developers are advertising high-rise condos near parks, is this something that excites you?

Absolutely. When people use their money and market their investments based on the accomplishment the city has made in improving its parks, that is an affirmation that it is money well-spent.

The Empire State Development Corporation recently removed the head of the planned Brooklyn Bridge Park, Wendy Leventer. What's going on there?

Replacing a Wendy Leventer is sort of a common thing that happens when you change governments. Wendy was appointed as part of the Pataki administration, so it was probably inevitable. I think Wendy did a good job, but she was in somewhat of an untenable position because, no matter what she did, there were some people in the community who were against the plan.

Does her removal have anything to do with the fact that there are people against the plan?

No, it has nothing to do with that. I think it has to do with Governor Spitzer wanting to have his own team running ESDC, and he has every right to do that.

What is the timetable on the park?

I think a complete build-out is probably four or five years away. It's a very complicated project. Anytime you build along the waterfront, it is very complicated and very expensive. And it will be very expensive to maintain.

A lot of that budget is going to come from the luxury condos that are going to be inside the park.

Well, I'm going to differ with your description a little bit here. Right along the edges of the land—which is not parkland—there will be two very small and discreet locations where there are some towers put up that will generate all the income needed to take care of the park.

Opponents say, "You're building towers in the park." It's not quite a fabrication, but it's an exaggeration. They are building some towers in a currently industrial area at the edge of what will become a fine park. The same way they built Riverside Park and Riverside Drive—a whole swath of real estate was developed along their edges.

But it will be within the park. Is that something you feel you need to defend?

Oh, absolutely. I think it's fantastic. First of all, it will not be in the park; it will be on the edge of the park …. Not so long ago, the parks were abandoned by the political leaders. This is a way to make sure that the parks will never slip back, and also to make sure that they are not a burden to the rest of the city.

Do you think this is a good model for future parks?

The answer is: Only on a very limited basis.

Why?

I think it doesn't work in most areas. I think it works only in areas where there is a strong likelihood of successful developments.

So the model should be where there is a potential for successful development?

I think the models will work when there is a need for it, and where the city can't otherwise there have to be a lot of factors to it.

Within 25 years, the Mayor wants every New Yorker to be within a 10-minute walk of a park. How plausible is that?

That's totally plausible. Already, three-quarters of New Yorkers live within a 10- minute walk of a park. We are continuing to build new parks.

How often are you in competition for an area—a parcel of land in Brooklyn, say—where that land might be available, but you're competing with some private developers?

Well, not developers, the competition is often with city agencies. A lot of people will tell you that the most important thing that they should be doing is developing housing. So there's a piece of city-owned land in central Brooklyn: What's more important—building affordable housing, or building a park? That's what you call a Hobson's choice.

You could argue, and very cogently, that affordable housing is more important. We would argue that a neighborhood that doesn't have parks is not livable.

If you could wave a magic wand and you could just get the land, where would you build more parks?

Central Brooklyn. Brownsville, Bedford Stuyvesant, Borough Park—there are almost no parks there.

When we talk about the new parks, Fresh Kills Park, Brooklyn Bridge Park, why the increase? Why is there such an emphasis placed on parks right now?

Parks make the city livable. New York City without parks is not a livable city. People want parks and want to live near parks. We are currently undergoing the biggest expansion since the 1930's. We're going to cut a ribbon on a new park four times a week every week this year. © NY Observer
 

Web spiritofvenice.com

Newsflash by Therese Dietlin

On Sunday, April 1, a young man brought to my table on the Boardwalk, a blob of crude oil he said he had found in the sand about 400 feet south of Dudley.  He was concerned because in the previous week he had heard on Coast to Coast that there had been a small earthquake off the coast and that a fault line had developed fissures through which oil was leaking from a deposit below.  While I have no way to confirm this story, I did see – and smell! - the crude oil on the piece of paper in his hand.  This word is being passed along to give people notice that if there was one blob of crude in the sand, there will be more and to caution people to be on the lookout.  Therese Dietlin, politico across from the Bistro on the Boardwalk.

 

New Lawsuit Settlement for Peggy Lee Kennedy by Common Knowledge

It is rumored on Venice Boardwalk that Peggy Lee Kennedy of Venice Food Not Bombs recently received a settlement of $30,000 from the City of Los Angeles, presumably for the incident on June 11, 2006 (see photo) when she was arrested for violating LAMC 42.15.  Kennedy, with the help of civil rights attorney, Carol Sobel, has been in litigation with the City since July 2005 following the creation of the boardwalk lottery that went into effect March 1st, 2005.  In spite of their legal challenges to LAMC 42.15, Kennedy and Sobel have, in these two contentious years, never challenged the constitutionality of the “free expression” permit requirement, at the core of the lottery.  When questioned on this issue Sobel stated that “the City has the right” to require a permit, which she is unwilling, apparently, to challenge in court. 

 

Update:  according to reliable sources, a settlement hearing that was scheduled for Tuesday, April 3, 2007 for the two pending lawsuits which have, presumably, been amalgamated (Venice Food Not Bombs - CV 06-06560 and Matt Dowd/Michael Hunt - CV 06-04691), has been cancelled at the last minute. No new date has been rescheduled as of April 4, 2007.

 

The “20th” Century Artist

by Samuel L. Brantley

In times of old, the artist was treated as the immortals, freezing events in amazement, for all to see, and as a warning to the patriot of enemies.  As the manipulators of technical demonstration of the elusiveness and awareness of time, they sought to outdo themselves.  Performance artist Kirk Douglas of the “70s performed as Vincent van Gogh.  In one strke, he cut off his ear to get his point across.  The sight of blood pushed the performing arts fare into the spotlight; his death wish performance.  This backed the art dealer away from the visual artist, in fear, as the gladiator stood over the artist, Van Gogh, waiting for the audience to give the thumbs down.  The upper class feared watching the visual artist in his thrust for perfection, secretly in their hearts waiting for the flow of blood that spilled under the feet of the performer.  The visual artist had taken a back seat to the performing artist.  Off stage, the dealers stopped revealing themselves at the front door, only dealing at second hand and with those who made the camera, the spotlight of performing, a great attraction.   The artist had failed to temper his work.  The audience cheered; the gladiator had made his mark.  The performing artist was marched across the red carpet like French fries, a fast food snack.  The visual artists were able to survive the words that cut their veins. © CD10 Samuel L. Brantley

 

Love him or loathe him, he nailed this one...(submitted by Bill Greenslade)

If you are a surviving family member of an American soldier killed in action, the first check you get is a $6,000 direct death benefit, half of which is taxable. Next, you get $1,750 for burial costs. If you are the surviving spouse, you get $833 a month until you remarry. And there's a payment of $211 per month for each child d under 18. When the child hits 18, those payments come to a screeching halt.  Keep in mind that some of the people who are getting an average of $1.185 million up to $4.7 million are complaining that it's not enough. Their deaths were tragic, but for most, they were simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Soldiers put themselves in harms way FOR ALL OF US, and they and their families know the dangers.  We also learned over the weekend that some of the victims from the Oklahoma City bombing have started an organization asking for the same deal that the September 11 families are getting. In addition to that, some of the families of those bombed in the embassies are now asking for compensation as well.

 You see where this is going, don't you? Folks, this is part and parcel of over 50 years of entitlement politics in this country. It's just really sad. Every time a pay raise comes up for the military, they usually receive next to nothing of a raise. Now the green machine is in combat in the   Middle East while their families have to survive on food stamps and live in low-rent housing. Make sense? However, our own U.S. Congress voted  themselves a raise. Many of you don't know that they only have to be in Congress one time to receive a pension that is more than $15,000 per month. And most are now equal to being millionaires plus. They do not receive Social Security on retirement because they didn't have to pay into the system. If some of the military people stay in for 20 years and get out as an E-7, they may receive a pension of $1,000 per month, and the very people who placed them in harm's way receives a pension of $15,000 per month. I would like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay for our sons and  daughters who are now fighting. "When do we finally do something about this?"   © Rush Limbaugh

 

Bong Hits 4 Jesus - Court Hears Whether a Drug Statement Is Protected Free Speech for Students by Linda Greenhouse

Kenneth W. Starr had a strategy for convincing the Supreme Court that an Alaska high school principal and school board did not violate a student's free-speech rights by punishing him for displaying the words "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" on a 14-foot-long banner across the street from school as the 2002 Olympic torch parade went by.  "Illegal drugs and the glorification of the drug culture are profoundly serious problems for our nation," Mr. Starr, a former solicitor general, told the justices in the opening moments of his argument on Monday.  In other words, his approach was to present the free-speech case as a drug case and argue that whatever rights students may have under the First Amendment to express themselves, speaking in oblique or even in arguably humorous dissent from a school's official anti-drug message is not one of them. That was Mr. Starr's story, and he stuck with it, through a series of hypothetical questions from the justices and on into a one-minute rebuttal at the end of the lively hour. While Mr. Starr may not prevail on the full breadth of his argument, his strategy appeared on the verge of succeeding well enough to shield his clients, the Juneau School Board and Deborah Morse, the high school principal, from having to pay damages to the student, Joseph Frederick.  A majority of the court seemed willing to create what would amount to a drug exception to students' First Amendment rights, much as the court has in recent years permitted widespread drug testing of students, even those not personally suspected of using drugs, under a relaxed view of the Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches.  Mr. Starr's biggest ally on the court was the man who once worked as his deputy in the solicitor general's office, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. The chief justice intervened frequently throughout both sides of the argument, making clear his view that schools need not tolerate student expression that undermines what they define as their educational mission.

"Why is it that the classroom ought to be a forum for political debate simply because the students want to put that on their agenda?"   Chief Justice Roberts asked Mr. Starr. The question was particularly interesting because Mr. Starr had just sought to reassure the court that his argument was not limitless. The court's leading precedent on student speech, a 1969 decision called Tinker v. Des Moines School District, "articulates a baseline of political speech"  that students have a presumptive right to engage in, Mr. Starr said.  That was too far to the middle for the chief justice. "Presumably, the teacher's agenda is a little bit different and includes things like teaching Shakespeare or the Pythagorean theorem," he said, adding that "just because political speech is on the student's agenda, I'm not sure that it makes sense to read Tinker so broadly as to include protection of that speech."  And later, Chief Justice Roberts took issue with a suggestion by the student's lawyer, Douglas K. Mertz, that schools that seek to inculcate an anti-drug message must permit students, outside the formal classroom setting, to offer competing views. "Content neutrality is critical here," Mr. Mertz said. "Where does that notion that our schools have to be content neutral" come from, the chief justice wanted to know. He added, "I thought we wanted our schools to teach something, including something besides just basic elements, including character formation and not to use drugs."   More

John F. Kennedy Library:  America's Promise and America's Future  (Excerpts from a speech honoring poet Robert Frost given by President John F. Kennedy at Amherst College on October 26, 1963 – less than one month before he was murdered.  Note particularly the commentary on art, power and politics.)  A nation reveals itself not only by the men it produces but also by the men it honors, the men it remembers.  The men who create power make an indispensable contribution to the Nation's greatness, but the men who question power make a contribution just as indispensable, especially when that questioning is disinterested, for they determine whether we use power or power uses us.

In March 1962, persons of 18 years or older who had not completed high school made up 46 percent of the total labor force, and such persons comprised 64 percent of those who were unemployed. And in 1958, the lowest fifth of the families in the United States had 4 1/2 percent of the total personal income, the highest fifth, 44 1/2 percent. There is inherited wealth in this country and also inherited poverty. And unless the graduates of this college and other colleges like it who are given a running start in life--unless they are willing to put back into our society, those talents, the broad sympathy, the understanding, the compassion--unless they are willing to put those qualities back into the service of the Great Republic, then obviously the presuppositions upon which our democracy are based are bound to be fallible. The problems which this country now faces are staggering, both at home and abroad. We need the service, in the great sense, of every educated man or woman to find 10 million jobs in the next 2 1/2 years, to govern our relations--a country which lived in isolation for 150 years, and is now suddenly the leader of the free world--to govern our relations with over 100 countries, to govern those relations with success so that the balance of power remains strong on the side of freedom, to make it possible for Americans of all different races and creeds to live together in harmony, to make it possible for a world to exist in diversity and freedom. All this requires the best of all of us.  

I look forward to a great future for America, a future in which our country will match its military strength with our moral restraint, its wealth with our wisdom, its power with our purpose. I look forward to an America which will not be afraid of grace and beauty, which will protect the beauty of our natural environment, which will preserve the great old American houses and squares and parks of our national past, and which will build handsome and balanced cities for our future.  If art is to nourish the roots of our culture, society must set the artist free to follow his vision wherever it takes him. We must never forget that art is not a form of propaganda; it is a form of truth. And as Mr. MacLeish once remarked of poets, there is nothing worse for our trade than to be in style. In free society art is not a weapon and it does not belong to the spheres of polemic and ideology. Artists are not engineers of the soul. It may be different elsewhere. But democratic society--in it, the highest duty of the writer, the composer, the artist is to remain true to himself and to let the chips fall where they may. In serving his vision of the truth, the artist best serves his nation. And the nation which disdains the mission of art invites the fate of Robert Frost's hired man, the fate of having "nothing to look backward to with pride, and nothing to look forward to with hope."

I look forward to a great future for America, a future in which our country will match its military strength with our moral restraint, its wealth with our wisdom, its power with our purpose.

I look forward to an America which will not be afraid of grace and beauty, which will protect the beauty of our natural environment, which will preserve the great old American houses and squares and parks of our national past, and which will build handsome and balanced cities for our future.

I look forward to an America which will reward achievement in the arts as we reward achievement in business or statecraft.

I look forward to an America which will steadily raise the standards of artistic accomplishment and which will steadily enlarge cultural opportunities for all of our citizens.

And I look forward to an America which commands respect throughout the world not only for its strength but for its civilization as well.

And I look forward to a world which will be safe not only for democracy and diversity but also for personal distinction.  © J. F. Kennedy

JOIN 4-TIME GRAMMY AWARD WINNER
EDWIN HAWKINS
IN HIS APPEAL TO RAISE FUNDS  
FOR AMERICA’S HOMELESS


Donate $10 online and download a copy of Edwin Hawkins’   “People In Need” (PIN) song  
www.myspace.com/edwinhawkins

or send $15.00 check/money order

The Benefit Network/PIN Fund
P O Box 1952  Venice CA 90294

 

<*> <*> <*> <*>

 

Deadline for each issue is 25th of the month.
Email articles, poems, etc. in Word .doc format and
pictures/photos in .jpg format  as attachments.
Thank you!

* * * * * * * *