|
Want to support this
website? Make
your tax-deductible
donation here:
|
|
VIDEO AND PHOTOS |
|
Arlington West |
|
Dogg Daze
|
|
Graffiti
Gallery |
|
SOV Photo Gallery |

POP-TV has a new
Cable TV Internship
See Buddy Clark
to Sign up for free
Media Internships
310-266-9465
Fax
310-401-0274
email
|
|
COOL LINKS |
|
Anti-War Radio |
|
Current TV |
|
Deep Eddy |
|
1st Amendment |
|
Free Press |
|
Free Speech Radio |
|
Free
Speech TV |
|
Hotmall |
|
|
|
VENICE BEACH |
|
About Us Now |
|
Beachhead |
|
Beach Cam |
|
Councilmember |
|
Drum Circle |
|
GRVNC |
|
History |
|
Hostels |
|
Rec & Parks |
|
SOV Blog
|
|
SOV Petition |
|
SOV News
Group |
|
Surf Report |
|
Venice Forum |
|
Venice Paper |
Two Venice Streets Get Solar
Streetlights
by Vince
Echavaria
Residents living on two
streets in Venice say they have the sun to thank for
making their neighborhood a little bit brighter at
night.
Victoria and Coeur d'Alene
Avenues, both within the Presidents Row Neighborhood of
Venice, are the two locations where new solar-powered
street lights have recently been installed as part of a
pilot program of the Los Angeles City Bureau of Street
Lighting.
The street lights, which
stand at 609 Victoria Ave. and 811 Coeur d'Alene Ave.,
are composed of a solar panel that collects energy from
the sun during the day and a battery that stores the
energy until it is used to power the lights between dusk
and dawn each day, said Harris Levey, member of the
Presidents Row Neighborhood Assn. in Venice.
"We can harness the power
of the sun to light our streets and improve safety
without using any other resources," Levey said.
In the event that there is
no sunlight on a certain day, the system's battery has
the capacity to store enough solar energy to power the
lights for a few days.
The two Venice streets are
currently the only residential locations in Los Angeles
where a solar street light has been installed, said
Norma Isahakian, city Bureau of Street Lighting
assistant director. The only other location in Los
Angeles with a functioning solar street light is on the
San Fernando bicycle path, Isahakian said.
Six solar street lights have
been installed in the City of Santa Monica.
Members of the Venice Presidents Row Neighborhood
Association say they worked for nearly four years to get
the solar lights installed in their neighborhood and had
the support of the office of former City Councilwoman
Cindy Miscikowski, whose office provided grant money for
the program. The residents praised the addition of the
new lights to their street, calling them an improvement
for safety.
"We are so happy with our
light," said Presidents Row Neighborhood Assn.
member Lindsey Folsom, who lives on Victoria Avenue.
Folsom said she helped begin
the effort to acquire the solar lights as a way to
improve safety on neighborhood streets, particularly at
night. Some residential streets in the area tend to be
dark at night and residents wanted to brighten up the
streets to make them safer, she said.
Levey said a main reason the
streets are darker than many others is that Presidents
Row is an old neighborhood of Venice, where street
lights are far apart.
Residents knew they wanted
more street lights, but instead of installing something
that would use more electricity, they decided to take
advantage of a source that is plentiful in Southern
California — sunlight, Folsom said.
"Why not make use of a
natural resource that we've got here?" Folsom said.
Solar street lights not only
make use of an alternative energy source but are also
expected to be more cost-effective than electric lights,
Levey said. The solar lights are also cheaper to
install and can lead to some environmental benefits,
Isahakian said. The lights were installed by two
separate vendors, SOL (Solar Outdoor Lighting) for the
Victoria Avenue site and BioProduct for the Coeur
d'Alene site.
Isahakian said city street
lighting officials are pleased with how the Victoria
Avenue light has been operating, but the Coeur d'Alene
light has had difficulty staying on for as long the
other. City street lighting officials say they
plan to study the effectiveness of the lights before
considering installation at other parts of the city.
But Presidents Row Assn. members say they are confident
that their neighborhood lights will serve as a benchmark
for future solar street lighting projects in the city.
© The Argonaut
The
California Coalition for Food and Farming (CCFF), an
alliance of more than forty-five environmental,
food, and farming organizations, aims to change things
this year.
Last month, a letter signed by more than 100 farmers,
businesses, and organizations was presented to US
Representative Dennis Cardoza, (D- Merced), stating that,
"At the very least, federal investment in organic
agriculture should be equivalent to its proportional share
of the U.S. food market."
And just last week, a group of sustainable agriculture
reps. met with 13 House offices and 2 Senate offices in
Washington, DC, to promote the alliance's primary goals.
More
|
|

Open Letter to Mayor
Villaraigosa
by the Spirit of Venice
We, the undersigned,
demand the immediate resignation of Mark Brown from the office of the
City Attorney. Mark Brown (Bar #
60683), during
the course of the last three years, has taken a central role in writing
ordinances that unfairly oppress and harass hardworking people of the
city of Los Angeles. Most recently, he has made great attempts to
destroy the Venice Beach Boardwalk, which is a historic site for the
gathering of artists, performers and activists as a “free speech zone,”
as well as a highly attended tourist destination. In the wake of
the first lottery system, passed by the city council on October 2004,
most of what remained on the Boardwalk was commercial vending – the very
opposite of what the city should advocate. The outcome was
unacceptable. Mark Brown's law literally chased away the artists
and activists and made the Boardwalk a breeding ground for commercial
vending. In his second attempt – to “fix the nightmare he had
created – he and his associates have re-written the ordinance with only
minor adjustments that do not meet the expectations of first amendment
advocates. He has placed limitations on “noise,” yet unequally enforces
them – building developers make far more noise in construction than any
performer ever could. In addition, outspoken activists are being
ticketed for displaying political language and simply for standing
outside the “regulated” lines! We can longer shout our messages to
the public! All of these are citable offences!
Is Venice Beach a prison or a “free speech zone?” At this
point, it is hard to decipher the difference.
In a public forum
about the Venice Beach ordinance, Mark Brown professed to the crowd that
he has never been to Venice Beach and has no desire to ever come (we can
provide video documentation if necessary). We, the concerned
citizens of the Venice Beach Boardwalk, demand to know how a person with
such a perspective could attain the position of writing a law that
affects the outcome of the very community he despises. We hold
Mark Brown directly accountable for wasting city resources and harassing
people who are working hard to make an honest living. We hold him
directly accountable for damaging and potentially destroying one of the
city of Los Angeles' most exciting historic locations. We believe
that Mark Brown's actions and intentions speak to what is evil about the
political process. When he and his associates first began writing
the ordinances, the Venice Beach vendors and supporters asked repeatedly
in front of the city council, with you as a council member and witness,
to engage in mediation instead of regulation of the Boardwalk. No
mediation was ever sought out! No compromises were ever made!
While dialogue and public forums were offered, not one of the
suggestions made by the Venice Beach vendors was taken seriously and
implemented into the ordinance. Instead, Mark Brown spearheaded an
agenda to bring down the Venice Beach Boardwalk. There is a
growing contradiction between the opinions of the people and those with
legal authority. If this is encouraged, it will certainly cast a
dark shadow over your administration. This contradiction
speaks loudly to who the law benefits. We believe that Mark Brown
is working in the interests of a few developers who would like to
destroy the Venice Beach Boardwalk, while at the same time harassing
some of the most outspoken and politically active citizens in order to
attain this very end. Mayor Villaraigosa, we supported you in your
election campaign, and we now demand that you support us in bringing an
end to Mark Brown's reign of terror against the Venice Beach
Boardwalk. Sincerely, The Spirit of
Venice
ACTION ALERT -
TAKE OUR NEIGHBORHOOD
BACK!
Residents
oppose the expansion of the Other Room ( a noisy bar at San Juan and
Abbot Kinney Blvd. They believe they have a really good chance of
fighting this expansion and need community support with letters and
showing up at the hearing.
Help stop The Other Room Bar from
expanding hours and capacity they are appealing their declined request
for:
1. Hour expansion from 2PM to 2AM
2. Sidewalk outdoor seating
3. Expanding Indoor seating
3 THINGS YOU CAN DO TO STOP THE BAR
FROM EXPANDING!
1) zoning case # ZA-2006-8310-CUB-1A -
Make calls & publicly register complaints against Other Room
2)
When you hear excessive noise call the police dept at 877-ASK-LAPD.
All phone calls go into the Other Room's file and will further support
the denial of their expansion. If you are affected by the noise,
loitering, and any late night issues, call and voice them to LAPD
3) Attend the meeting and voice your
concerns!
Wednesday, April 18 4:30 pm
Henry Medina West LA
Parking Enforcement Facility 2nd
FL
11214 West Exposition Blvd. 90064
Nearest Cross Sts: Off Sepulveda, 1 Block South of Pico
Public Opinion voiced at this hearing
will demonstrate how strong our concerns are for protecting the quality
of life of our neighborhood. The quality of our neighborhood life
is in jeopardy. This is the final appeal for The Other Room
Expansion. Your involvement is critical now!
<*> <*> <*> <*>
Community Meeting Report for March 28, 2007
by Taimie Bryant
A brief report about the neighborhood
meeting that was held on Wednesday, March 28th (2007) at the Penmar
Recreation Center. Topics included a brief review of the current
situation at St. Joseph’s, the increasingly heavy traffic on Walgrove,
the high volume of idling diesel tandem trucks on Lincoln Blvd and
residential streets that connect to Lincoln, the current situation with
the house at which drug-dealing was allegedly taking place, and the
proposed design requirements for commercial establishments on Lincoln
Blvd. I hope that attendance will increase at future meetings because a
lot of valuable information can be obtained from speakers and from each
other as we come together to solve problems and get to know one another.
Mark Grant, who is Councilman Rosendahl’s deputy in charge of this part
of the Council District 11, reported that, as of yesterday, St. Joseph’s
is still responding to the Department of Building and Safety’s review of
their permit for changed use. Mr. Grant said that he had no further
information at this time but that a meeting is being planned to provide
further information and opportunities for discussion. He invited
us—whether favorably inclined towards the Center or unfavorably
inclined—to let the Councilman know what our thoughts are. Mark Grant
can be e-mailed at mark.grant@lacity.org
More
<*> <*> <*> <*>
$$$
THE FED RIPOFF!
by W.
George E.K. French
When the Federal
Reserve Act was railroaded through Congress at eleven thirty Christmas
Eve, 1913, a truly huge amount of money had been spent by certain
private banks to push the legislation through. Every member of
Congress present had been bought and paid for by those banks. Since this
all happened, as the banks fully expected, trillions of dollars have
been guzzled by them, at the expense of all our people. The idea
that ANY nation should have to employ private banks to distribute the
bills and coinage produced by the government owned mints is pure
insanity. For these banks to charge full face value of the bills
and coinage they manufacture, plus a very high rate of interest for
allowing the citizens to use them, is more madness. It doesn't
stop there, however. For this incredible thievery to have
continued until the present day is almost beyond belief.
Nevertheless, it has. The private corporation chartered by the
banks, named the Internal Revenue Service, continues to wage its
financial war against our people every day. Most of our people
think, wrongly, that the IRS is part of the government. IT
ISN'T. The IRS, in its reign of terror, has caused more
suicides, divorces, bankruptcies, foreclosures and homeless beggars than
any other thing. This millstone around the necks of our people is
a hideous and criminal enterprise, brought into being by bribery and
maintained by more collusion, bribery, blackmail and murder.
Why has this
institution continued to this day? Why should our people be
hoodwinked into thinking it is a legitimate part of our government, and
that they are unpatriotic if they don't pay what the bandits running
this racket demand? The answer is ignorance. The whole IRS thing
has always been shrouded in secrecy, cloaked in fear, and enforced by
Judges whose rulings have been bought by the perpetrators of this
vicious system. The tax lawyers, accountants, tax preparers and so
forth, are all part of the problem. They all treat the tax as
though it was mandatory as well as legitimate. Of course they do,
for it is their bread and butter, their livelihood. The last thing
that any of them would want is for it to go away. It gives them
all a good living. When the tax lawyer or the accountant tells you that
you should go ahead and pay the IRS when you are sent a notice saying
you've been penalized five hundred bucks, it is a damned lie. No
IRS agent has the right or authority to penalize anyone.
Before you can be
penalized there must be a trial, and if you demand it (and ONLY if you
demand it, see the Seventh Amendment), a jury trial of your peers, a
guilty verdict and a court order. Without these things, you cannot
legally be fined, penalized, garnisheed, levied against or anything
else. No IRS agent can issue a levy, a garnishment, or a fine.
Only the courts can do that.
Unfortunately,
most people don't know this. They think the IRS can do all this
stuff at will. The lawyer and the CPA all tell them to pay the
penalty and then, of course, bill the poor sucker for the rotten advice
they have just given. They don't tell their clients about “rogue”
letters and notices, which lack an OMB number and expiration date or
have a rubber
stamp having instead
of an actual human signature. Instead, they give their “expert”
advice, bill the poor ignorant fool for it, and smile all the way to the
bank. These people have a “stock in trade.” They continually
profit from the public's ignorance. Why do you think the laws are
so confusing? So that we will have to pay some lawyer to take us
through them. Lawyers make some marvelous living from our
ignorance. Why do you suppose that the Founding Fathers wrote the
original Thirteenth Amendment – the one that was conveniently “lost”
shortly after the Civil war? It was never legally repealed; it was
on every copy of the Constitutional Amendments for more than eighty
years, and then, all of a sudden, it was replaced by a completely
different Thirteenth Amendment. The original Thirteenth Amendment
said that no attorney who was a member of a bar association could hold
public office. It also said that no one could hold any title or
special privilege that would set him above the rest of us. These
were called emollients, and they were not allowed. Needless to
say, the replacement to this original Amendment said nothing about this.
Today, more than ninety percent of our Congressmen are lawyers and, of
course, they are members of Bar Associations. The Declaration of
Independence and the Constitution are without any 'legalese” and were
stated in very clear, plain English that everyone can read and
understand. Up until the time that original Thirteenth Amendment
strangely disappeared and was replaced, the same thing was true for all
other laws that were written. Since the post Civil war switch, we
have had hundreds of “Confuse-a-lawyers” muddying up the waters and
making things as incomprehensible as possible.
Just how did they get
away with all of this? Per usual, secrecy, bribery, blackmail, and
greed. The same thing holds true for the IRS crap. People
don't know that every dime they pay in “Income Tax” goes to the banks
that make up the Fed. They think their taxes go into the general
fund. They don't. If people knew they every dime goes to the
Fed Banks to pay that “face value plus interest” they charge for
distributing our printed money and coinage to all of the other banks in
this country, they might wonder why, and start asking some very
embarrassing questions. Do you think those privately owned banks
that make up the Federal Reserve System would ever be willing to give up
this marvelous system for bilking the American People out of untold
billions of dollars EVERY year? It is my belief that murders are
done every year to protect their filthy racket. The bankers cannot
allow this information to become common knowledge, or of common interest
to the bulk of our people. They will do ANYTHING to protect
themselves and their criminal enterprise. There are a number of
other facts that you might find of interest, regarding our beloved
country, and the rotten, corrupt criminals who have consistently sold us
down the river at every opportunity, for their own greedy benefit.
Stay tuned. If they don't get me first, I'll fill you in on all
sorts of lovely things that you should know and that the perpetrators
are hoping you don't find out.
© George E.K.
French
Luxury condos INSIDE a NYC Park
by Robert Lederman
Some people think I'm making this
stuff up about the parks and sidewalks being offered for sale...Hey, you
can't make up anything as extreme as what they are actually doing and
plan to do in the near future! All public property, including the
sidewalks and Parks artists now freely sell on, will be offered for sale
to the highest bidders. It will be used for advertising kiosks,
corporate promotions, fast food stands and of all things, luxury condos!
This is exactly why NYC officials so desperately want to get rid of
street artists... our rights are the last vestige of free speech on the
streets and in the public parks of NYC.
© Robert Lederman
'We're going to cut a ribbon on
a new park four times a week every week this year,' says City Parks
Commissioner Adrian Benepe. Is that a good thing?
by John Koblin
Location: What's the value of living near a
New York City park?
Benepe: I think it's the crucial factor for
many people when choosing where they live and where they invest their
money and develop. Soon after I became parks commissioner, I noticed in
the real-estate sections, increasingly, how many of the ads focus on a
park that is nearby or across the street rather than the building that
they're advertising.
When you see these ads where developers are
advertising high-rise condos near parks, is this something that excites
you?
Absolutely. When people use their money and
market their investments based on the accomplishment the city has made
in improving its parks, that is an affirmation that it is money
well-spent.
The Empire State Development Corporation
recently removed the head of the planned Brooklyn Bridge Park, Wendy
Leventer. What's going on there?
Replacing a Wendy Leventer is sort of a
common thing that happens when you change governments. Wendy was
appointed as part of the Pataki administration, so it was probably
inevitable. I think Wendy did a good job, but she was in somewhat of an
untenable position because, no matter what she did, there were some
people in the community who were against the plan.
Does her removal have anything to do with
the fact that there are people against the plan?
No, it has nothing to do with that. I think
it has to do with Governor Spitzer wanting to have his own team running
ESDC, and he has every right to do that.
What is the timetable on the park?
I think a complete build-out is probably
four or five years away. It's a very complicated project. Anytime you
build along the waterfront, it is very complicated and very expensive.
And it will be very expensive to maintain.
A lot of that budget is going to come from
the luxury condos that are going to be inside the park.
Well, I'm going to differ with your
description a little bit here. Right along the edges of the land—which
is not parkland—there will be two very small and discreet locations
where there are some towers put up that will generate all the income
needed to take care of the park.
Opponents say, "You're building towers in
the park." It's not quite a fabrication, but it's an exaggeration. They
are building some towers in a currently industrial area at the edge of
what will become a fine park. The same way they built Riverside Park and
Riverside Drive—a whole swath of real estate was developed along their
edges.
But it will be within the park. Is that
something you feel you need to defend?
Oh, absolutely. I think it's fantastic.
First of all, it will not be in the park; it will be on the edge of the
park …. Not so long ago, the parks were abandoned by the political
leaders. This is a way to make sure that the parks will never slip back,
and also to make sure that they are not a burden to the rest of the
city.
Do you think this is a good model for future
parks?
The answer is: Only on a very limited basis.
Why?
I think it doesn't work in most areas. I
think it works only in areas where there is a strong likelihood of
successful developments.
So the model should be where there is a
potential for successful development?
I think the models will work when there is a
need for it, and where the city can't otherwise there have to be a lot
of factors to it.
Within 25 years, the Mayor wants every New
Yorker to be within a 10-minute walk of a park. How plausible is that?
That's totally plausible. Already,
three-quarters of New Yorkers live within a 10- minute walk of a park.
We are continuing to build new parks.
How often are you in competition for an
area—a parcel of land in Brooklyn, say—where that land might be
available, but you're competing with some private developers?
Well, not developers, the competition is
often with city agencies. A lot of people will tell you that the most
important thing that they should be doing is developing housing. So
there's a piece of city-owned land in central Brooklyn: What's more
important—building affordable housing, or building a park? That's what
you call a Hobson's choice.
You could argue, and very cogently, that
affordable housing is more important. We would argue that a neighborhood
that doesn't have parks is not livable.
If you could wave a magic wand and you could
just get the land, where would you build more parks?
Central Brooklyn. Brownsville, Bedford
Stuyvesant, Borough Park—there are almost no parks there.
When we talk about the new parks, Fresh
Kills Park, Brooklyn Bridge Park, why the increase? Why is there such an
emphasis placed on parks right now?
Parks make the city livable. New York City
without parks is not a livable city. People want parks and want to live
near parks. We are currently undergoing the biggest expansion since the
1930's. We're going to cut a ribbon on a new park four times a week
every week this year. © NY Observer
|
Newsflash
by Therese Dietlin
On Sunday,
April 1, a young man brought to my table on the Boardwalk, a
blob of crude oil he said he had found in the sand about 400
feet south of Dudley. He was concerned because in the
previous week he had heard on Coast to Coast that there had
been a small earthquake off the coast and that a fault line
had developed fissures through which oil was leaking from a
deposit below. While I have no way to confirm this story, I
did see – and smell! - the crude oil on the piece of paper in
his hand. This word is being passed along to give people
notice that if there was one blob of crude in the sand, there
will be more and to caution people to be on the lookout.
Therese Dietlin, politico across from the Bistro on the
Boardwalk.
New
Lawsuit Settlement for Peggy Lee Kennedy
by Common Knowledge
It is
rumored on Venice Boardwalk that Peggy Lee Kennedy of Venice
Food Not Bombs recently received a settlement of $30,000 from
the City of Los Angeles, presumably for the incident on June
11, 2006 (see photo) when she was arrested for violating LAMC
42.15. Kennedy, with the help of civil rights attorney, Carol
Sobel, has been in litigation with the City since July 2005
following the creation of the boardwalk lottery that went into
effect March 1st, 2005. In spite of their legal
challenges to LAMC 42.15, Kennedy and Sobel have, in these two
contentious years, never challenged the constitutionality of
the “free expression” permit requirement, at the core
of the lottery. When questioned on this issue Sobel stated
that “the City has the right” to require a permit,
which she is unwilling, apparently, to challenge in court.
Update:
according to reliable
sources, a settlement hearing that was scheduled for Tuesday,
April 3, 2007 for the two pending lawsuits which have,
presumably, been amalgamated (Venice Food Not Bombs -
CV 06-06560
and Matt Dowd/Michael Hunt -
CV 06-04691),
has been cancelled at the last minute. No new date has been
rescheduled as of April 4, 2007.
The
“20th” Century Artist
by
Samuel L. Brantley
In times of
old, the artist was treated as the immortals, freezing events
in amazement, for all to see, and as a warning to the patriot
of enemies. As the manipulators of technical demonstration of
the elusiveness and awareness of time, they sought to outdo
themselves. Performance artist Kirk Douglas of the “70s
performed as Vincent van Gogh. In one strke, he cut off his
ear to get his point across. The sight of blood pushed the
performing arts fare into the spotlight; his death wish
performance. This backed the art dealer away from the visual
artist, in fear, as the gladiator stood over the artist, Van
Gogh, waiting for the audience to give the thumbs down. The
upper class feared watching the visual artist in his thrust
for perfection, secretly in their hearts waiting for the flow
of blood that spilled under the feet of the performer. The
visual artist had taken a back seat to the performing artist.
Off stage, the dealers stopped revealing themselves at the
front door, only dealing at second hand and with those who
made the camera, the spotlight of performing, a great
attraction. The artist had failed to temper his work. The
audience cheered; the gladiator had made his mark. The
performing artist was marched across the red carpet like
French fries, a fast food snack. The visual artists were able
to survive the words that cut their veins.
© CD10 Samuel
L. Brantley
Love him or loathe him, he nailed this one...(submitted by Bill Greenslade)
If you are a surviving family member of an American soldier
killed in action, the first check you get is a $6,000 direct
death benefit, half of which is taxable. Next, you get $1,750
for burial costs. If you are the surviving spouse, you get
$833 a month until you remarry. And there's a payment of $211
per month for each child d under 18. When the child hits 18,
those payments come to a screeching halt. Keep in mind that
some of the people who are getting an average of $1.185
million up to $4.7 million are complaining that it's not
enough. Their deaths were tragic, but for most, they were
simply in the wrong place at the wrong time. Soldiers put
themselves in harms way FOR ALL OF US, and they and their
families know the dangers. We also learned over the weekend
that some of the victims from the Oklahoma City bombing have
started an organization asking for the same deal that the
September 11 families are getting. In addition to that, some
of the families of those bombed in the embassies are now
asking for compensation as well.
You
see where this is going, don't you? Folks, this is part and
parcel of over 50 years of entitlement politics in this
country. It's just really sad. Every time a pay raise comes up
for the military, they usually receive next to nothing of a
raise. Now the green machine is in combat in the Middle East
while their families have to survive on food stamps and live
in low-rent housing. Make sense? However, our own U.S.
Congress voted themselves a raise. Many of you don't know
that they only have to be in Congress one time to receive a
pension that is more than $15,000 per month. And most are now
equal to being millionaires plus. They do not receive Social
Security on retirement because they didn't have to pay into
the system. If some of the military people stay in for 20
years and get out as an E-7, they may receive a pension of
$1,000 per month, and the very people who placed them in
harm's way receives a pension of $15,000 per month. I would
like to see our elected officials pick up a weapon and join
ranks before they start cutting out benefits and lowering pay
for our sons and daughters who are now fighting. "When do
we finally do something about this?" ©
Rush Limbaugh

Bong
Hits 4 Jesus - Court Hears Whether a Drug Statement Is
Protected Free Speech for Students
by
Linda
Greenhouse
Kenneth W.
Starr had a strategy for convincing the Supreme Court that an
Alaska high school principal and school board did not violate
a student's free-speech rights by punishing him for displaying
the words "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" on a 14-foot-long banner
across the street from school as the 2002 Olympic torch parade
went by. "Illegal drugs and the glorification of the drug
culture are profoundly serious problems for our nation,"
Mr. Starr, a former solicitor general, told the justices in
the opening moments of his argument on Monday. In other
words, his approach was to present the free-speech case as a
drug case and argue that whatever rights students may have
under the First Amendment to express themselves, speaking in
oblique or even in arguably humorous dissent from a school's
official anti-drug message is not one of them. That was Mr.
Starr's story, and he stuck with it, through a series of
hypothetical questions from the justices and on into a
one-minute rebuttal at the end of the lively hour. While Mr.
Starr may not prevail on the full breadth of his argument, his
strategy appeared on the verge of succeeding well enough to
shield his clients, the Juneau School Board and Deborah Morse,
the high school principal, from having to pay damages to the
student, Joseph Frederick. A majority of the court seemed
willing to create what would amount to a drug exception to
students' First Amendment rights, much as the court has in
recent years permitted widespread drug testing of students,
even those not personally suspected of using drugs, under a
relaxed view of the Fourth Amendment prohibition against
unreasonable searches. Mr. Starr's biggest ally on the court
was the man who once worked as his deputy in the solicitor
general's office, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. The chief
justice intervened frequently throughout both sides of the
argument, making clear his view that schools need not tolerate
student expression that undermines what they define as their
educational mission.
"Why is
it that the classroom ought to be a forum for political debate
simply because the students want to put that on their agenda?"
Chief Justice Roberts asked Mr. Starr. The question was
particularly interesting because Mr. Starr had just sought to
reassure the court that his argument was not limitless. The
court's leading precedent on student speech, a 1969 decision
called Tinker v. Des Moines School District, "articulates a
baseline of political speech" that students have a
presumptive right to engage in, Mr. Starr said. That was too
far to the middle for the chief justice. "Presumably, the
teacher's agenda is a little bit different and includes things
like teaching Shakespeare or the Pythagorean theorem," he
said, adding that "just because political speech is on the
student's agenda, I'm not sure that it makes sense to read
Tinker so broadly as to include protection of that speech."
And later, Chief Justice Roberts took issue with a
suggestion by the student's lawyer, Douglas K. Mertz, that
schools that seek to inculcate an anti-drug message must
permit students, outside the formal classroom setting, to
offer competing views. "Content neutrality is critical
here," Mr. Mertz said. "Where does that notion that our
schools have to be content neutral" come from, the chief
justice wanted to know. He added, "I thought we wanted our
schools to teach something, including something besides just
basic elements, including character formation and not to use
drugs."
More
John
F. Kennedy Library: America's Promise and America's
Future
(Excerpts from a speech honoring
poet Robert Frost given by President John F. Kennedy at
Amherst College on October 26, 1963 – less than one month
before he was murdered. Note particularly the commentary on
art, power and politics.) A nation reveals itself not only by
the men it produces but also by the men it honors, the men it
remembers. The men who create power make an indispensable
contribution to the Nation's greatness, but the men who
question power make a contribution just as indispensable,
especially when that questioning is disinterested, for they
determine whether we use power or power uses us.
In March
1962, persons of 18 years or older who had not completed high
school made up 46 percent of the total labor force, and such
persons comprised 64 percent of those who were unemployed. And
in 1958, the lowest fifth of the families in the United States
had 4 1/2 percent of the total personal income, the highest
fifth, 44 1/2 percent. There is inherited wealth in this
country and also inherited poverty. And unless the
graduates of this college and other colleges like it who are
given a running start in life--unless they are willing to put
back into our society, those talents, the broad sympathy, the
understanding, the compassion--unless they are willing to put
those qualities back into the service of the Great Republic,
then obviously the presuppositions upon which our democracy
are based are bound to be fallible. The problems which this
country now faces are staggering, both at home and abroad. We
need the service, in the great sense, of every educated man or
woman to find 10 million jobs in the next 2 1/2 years, to
govern our relations--a country which lived in isolation for
150 years, and is now suddenly the leader of the free
world--to govern our relations with over 100 countries, to
govern those relations with success so that the balance of
power remains strong on the side of freedom, to make it
possible for Americans of all different races and creeds to
live together in harmony, to make it possible for a world to
exist in diversity and freedom. All this requires the best of
all of us.
I look
forward to a great future for America, a future in which our
country will match its military strength with our moral
restraint, its wealth with our wisdom, its power with our
purpose. I look forward to an America which will not be afraid
of grace and beauty, which will protect the beauty of our
natural environment, which will preserve the great old
American houses and squares and parks of our national past,
and which will build handsome and balanced cities for our
future. If art is to nourish the roots of our culture,
society must set the artist free to follow his vision wherever
it takes him. We must never forget that art is not a form of
propaganda; it is a form of truth. And as Mr. MacLeish once
remarked of poets, there is nothing worse for our trade than
to be in style. In free society art is not a weapon and it
does not belong to the spheres of polemic and ideology.
Artists are not engineers of the soul. It may be different
elsewhere. But democratic society--in it, the highest duty of
the writer, the composer, the artist is to remain true to
himself and to let the chips fall where they may. In serving
his vision of the truth, the artist best serves his nation.
And the nation which disdains the mission of art invites the
fate of Robert Frost's hired man, the fate of having
"nothing to look backward to with pride, and nothing to look
forward to with hope."
I look
forward to a great future for America, a future in which our
country will match its military strength with our moral
restraint, its wealth with our wisdom, its power with our
purpose.
I look
forward to an America which will not be afraid of grace and
beauty, which will protect the beauty of our natural
environment, which will preserve the great old American houses
and squares and parks of our national past, and which will
build handsome and balanced cities for our future.
I look
forward to an America which will reward achievement in the
arts as we reward achievement in business or statecraft.
I look
forward to an America which will steadily raise the standards
of artistic accomplishment and which will steadily enlarge
cultural opportunities for all of our citizens.
And I look
forward to an America which commands respect throughout the
world not only for its strength but for its civilization as
well.
And I look
forward to a world which will be safe not only for democracy
and diversity but also for personal distinction. ©
J. F. Kennedy
JOIN
4-TIME GRAMMY AWARD WINNER
EDWIN HAWKINS
IN HIS APPEAL TO RAISE FUNDS
FOR AMERICA’S HOMELESS
Donate $10 online
and download a copy of Edwin Hawkins’ “People In
Need” (PIN) song
www.myspace.com/edwinhawkins
or send $15.00 check/money order
The Benefit
Network/PIN Fund
P O Box 1952
Venice CA 90294
<*> <*> <*> <*>
Deadline for each issue is 25th of the month.
Email
articles, poems, etc. in Word .doc format and
pictures/photos in .jpg format as attachments.
Thank you!
* * * * * * * *
|
|
|