SOV-heading-web.jpg (47437 bytes)

l     Contact      l      SOV Archives     l       SOV Blog      l     SOV Facebook     l     SOV Myspace      l       SOV Network       l      SOV Youtube     l

SUPPORT SOV!
make your
tax-deductible donation here:

Venice Beach

Beach Cam
Beachhead
Councilmember
Drum Circle
History
Hostels
Rec & Parks
SOV Archives
SOV Blog
SOV Forum
SOV Network
Surf Report
Tech Team
Venice Forum
Venice Paper
VNC
Hotel-Summer RiseSmart Inc. Wayne Dyer 125x125 PCSecurityShield Hicks - Toronto 2009
125x125 Hay House, Inc. Pingo Gaiam.com, Inc Buy As Seen On TV DVD Collections - Only at MusicSpace.com! Do It Myself Website Builder

THE MAKINGS OF
A PAINTERS' PROTEST

By Barbara Ransom

UPDATE: The same group of artists [who protested on the beach the weekend before - see below] formed a "painters protest walk" on Saturday, August 1, 2009 because, once again, they were not picked for spaces in the lottery that weekend.  The walk started at noon and continued until about 3:00.  The artists made various mobile carts to carry their artwork and protest signs.  They marched the length of the boardwalk twice, making several circles, with supporters and new artists joining them.  They also handed out fliers to interested people.  Onlookers and other venders cheered, clapped, asked questions, and showed their support for the artists' cause.  The police did not interfere with the walk at all. 

I attended the Venice Beach Boardwalk Lottery on Tuesday morning [July 21], as an observer.  A fascinating eclectic mix of people stood around chatting, drinking coffee, and waiting, waiting for their chance to claim a ten by ten spot on the Venice Boardwalk for the coming week or weekend.   Each person put their seller’s card into a green tumbler and, precisely at 8:30am, the drawing for the weekend began.  As the official from Parks and Recreation drew the cards from the tumbler fifteen at a time, talking would hush as he announced the venders’ names through a speaker system.  The chosen venders would then go sign up for the available spaces.  There are one hundred “I zone” spots and one hundred “P zone” spots on the boardwalk, each zone with different vending rules, and each with a separate lottery.   About three hundred people were gathered for the “I zone” lottery and perhaps two hundred for the “P zone” – seemingly, not very good chances for either one. But, at least everyone has a fair chance.   Just like Abbott Kinney, back in 1902, when he won his half of the ocean front property we now call Venice with a coin toss.  But as time went on, the rumblings of frustration began in the crowd.  I walked around and listened in.  Many of the venders are disheartened with the lottery process for two main reasons.

First, apparently, there are people cheating to get a spot.  Some people are supposedly getting their family members seller’s permits and then entering all of them in the lottery to improve their chances of getting a spot.  The rumor is that there are families of ten doing this and people are even getting cards for their children.   And then there are apparently people who don’t plan on selling anything on the boardwalk who enter cards into the lottery.  When they get a spot, they then sell their spots to others for cash.  But, most frustrating to many, is the commercial vending. 

Anyone, as they walk down the boardwalk, can see the large amount of commercial vending.  In one block, there are several different spots selling the same mass produced made in china necklaces, bracelets, or plastic encased insects.  These items are obviously inexpensive, easy to get, and sell well.  They are a quick and simple way to gain income in a down economy.   So, what’s wrong with that?

According to a group of local artists, it is not only against the ordinances of the boardwalk to sell these items, but it is also offensive to the “spirit” of Venice.   They feel that the boardwalk is becoming a “flea market” or “swap meet” instead of the free speech zone it was intended.  They’d like to see local artists with handmade items get priority in the lottery, over the commercial vendors.  They would like to see the ordinances enforced by someone, and they would like to see those who “cheat” in the lottery, banned.  Local artist Joel Harris said, “We want to see the free speech zone protected by local authorities because without this, commercial vending will keep growing.”  So, what can they do?

When the lottery ended, and this group of about eight artists had not received spots for the upcoming weekend, they formulated a “Painters Protest” for Saturday July 25th.  They gathered at 8am in the Rose Avenue parking lot, and set up their booths west of the bike path – in the sand.  It was a classy display of well made, unique, beautiful artwork by about twelve local artists.  They had a few protest signs and one black banner that simply said “Painters Protest.”  It was a nice set up – much nicer and more interesting than some of what was set up on the boardwalk just in front of them.  Of course, the police showed up around 12:30 on a complaint.  There was a small meeting of the group of artists and the five officers.  Two artists took down their work as the officers tried to decide if any laws were being broken, or if any permits were needed.  The artists were merely showing their artwork, and not selling anything; selling being the main offense the police could unquestionably sight on the beach. 

After about three hours of discussion, and close observation by the police that truly nothing was being sold, a captain from the beach patrol was called out.  He didn’t have any answers as he wasn’t able to access the ordinance book since it was a weekend.  So instead he took pictures of the event with his phone so he could consult with Los Angeles County Beaches on Monday in regards to the displays.  The police left, and the remaining artists packed up around 4:30, pleased with their protest.  They hoped they were able to bring more attention to the boardwalk problems, and that they showed the shoppers along the boardwalk the quality of work they were missing by supporting commercial vending.  Harris hoped the protest effectively passed along their vision, “To have a community of artists, free speech advocates, performers, and musicians who can depend on the Venice free speech zone to share their message and talent with the public.”  They haven’t planned a repeat protest, nor do they feel setting up on the beach is a permanent solution.

So, what is the solution here?  Ask any Venetian, or vender, or tourist, and each will have a different idea: more enforcement, less enforcement, petitions, marches, protests, walk outs, meetings, law suits, letters, a new system for selecting venders.  But how about a cultural revolution instead?  How about, instead of division, or instead of sinking to the level of selling bugs to feed your family, or instead of arresting those who do, find your own spirit of Venice.  If you are lucky enough to get a boardwalk spot, access your own creativity and inspiration and become an artist.  Inspire us!  Everyone can create and it is about time for another Renaissance. Put Venice back on the map for culture instead of crap.  Maybe we will produce the next Michelangelo right here in Venice.

<><><><><><>

Ocean Front Walk
Hotel Coming to Venice?

by Dakota

305_OFW.jpg (87813 bytes)

Because so little goes on in Venice without some colossal fight, this seems worth pointing out: According to documents filed with the city planning department this week, developers are proposing putting a 24-room hotel at 305-309 Ocean Front Walk (near Rose Avenue). The project would include a 1,877-square foot restaurant with a bar and outdoor seating area, and one level of subterranean parking with 45 spaces. According to the documents, there's an existing vacant store on the site that would be demolished for the project. It looks like this project has been kicking around since at least 2006, so its current status isn't clear. Older documents call the project the Ocean Front Walk Hotel. The tidbit follows news that the Best Western hotel at 1697 Pacific Avenue is being reborn as the Hotel Erwin, while Venice residents will recall the huge fight over the Hotel Ray at 901 Abbot Kinney Boulevard, a project that was ultimately shot down.

<><><><><><>  

 

VNC.jpg (3929 bytes)

<><><><><><>

RiseSmart Inc.


LinkShare_234x60  

    Custom Search

______________________

PRESS RELEASE

FREE SPEECH IS A RIGHT NOT A LOTTERY PRIZE!

Venice Beach Boardwalk Coalition (VBBC) challenges City of Los Angeles Permit/Lottery on Venice Boardwalk

On June 24, 2009, Seattle Center's permit regulations, imposed on street performers, were overturned in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals by an 11 member "en banc" panel of judges, including Judge Harry Pregerson, father of Judge Dean Pregerson, who, the City of Los Angeles claims, presided over the creation of the current LAMC 42.15 ordinance that regulates the Free Speech Zone (FSZ) on the west side of Venice Boardwalk. 

Seattle's law, requiring a permit to engage in [individual] speech: “constitutes a dramatic departure from our national heritage and constitutional tradition," according to Judge Marsha Berzon, writing for the majority opinion. Additionally, the City of Seattle required free expressionists (artists, performers, politico's, etc) to wear badges, refrain from soliciting gratuities, stay away from captive audience and work only in designated sites. Similarly, in the Venice Boardwalk FSZ, the City of Los Angeles requires free expressionists to purchase a permit and enter a lottery; just to have a chance to win an opportunity to exercise their First Amendment Free Speech rights, in city specified "designated spaces" in the FSZ, in accordance with city rules, including wearing badges.  

VBBC free expressionists are demanding that the City of Los Angeles rescind the unconstitutional permit/ lottery and remove all "unprotected" retail commercial vending operating under the current LAMC 42.15.  As Judge Marsha Berzon writes: "It is our belief that the protections afforded by the First Amendment are nowhere stronger than in streets & parks, both categorized for First Amendment purposes as traditional public fora. In such fora, the government’s right to limit expressive activity is sharply circumscribed. Among traditional public fora, parks [such as Venice Beach], are especially important locales for communication among the citizenry, as they have immemorially been held in trust for the use of public, and have been used for purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions." Furthermore, VBBC claims that these important protections should not be subverted to allow the "unprotected" retail commercial vending that currently proliferates in the FSZ, driving out expressionists such as artists, activists, performers, politicos and others with a real "protected" message. 

For more information on this topic, or to schedule an interview with Venice Beach Boardwalk Coalition spokesperson, Lisa Green and other free expressionists, please call 310 391-7686 or email at lisaaverde@yahoo.com. If you publish or use this information please inform us so we can monitor, and send you additional information pertinent to your community. 

# # #

RESTORE FREE SPEECH @ THE BEACH

<><><><><><>

OAKWOOD DOG PARK ISSUE RAISES CONCERNS OF GENTRIFICATION   

  By Melody Hanatani

dogpark.jpg (107835 bytes)
Dogs On Leash Sign at Oakwood Park

The long-standing gentrification issue in a historically black and Latino neighborhood is now going to the dogs.

That’s the problem that some residents near the Oakwood Recreation Center believe is underlying a growing conflict between dog owners who run their pups off leash at the local park and those who want to keep the animals securely tied and away from children.

The increasing affluence of Venice has been a sensitive issue that has popped up throughout the Los Angeles neighborhood, including along Abbot Kinney and Windward Circle where residents are trying to fight off chain stores, along Rose Avenue where a Whole Foods moved in last year, and for the past 10 years, the Oakwood area where long-time residents complain about the presence of off-leash dogs, which is in violation of the city ordinance.

“When families in the neighborhood see the blatant disregard for the law and there is signage throughout the park, it sends a message that they’re above the law and privileged,” Lydia Ponce, who serves on the Oakwood Park Advisory Board, said. “It sets up a cultural divide.”

The lack of canine-friendly facilities has also been an issue raised by many dog owners who point out that the only other real alternative to Oakwood is the Westminster Off-Leash Dog Park, which is located about a mile away but has been criticized as being unkempt and filled with unfriendly-looking pit bulls.  More

Courtesy of Santa Monica Daily Press

<><><><><><>

KRISHNA FESTIVAL 2009


Find more photos like this on SPIRIT OF VENICE

 Save 70% on Air Optix Night and Day

Register.com Hosting 225x132

LINKS

peaceflame.gif (60294 bytes)

PALMS-2.jpg (203608 bytes)

Sonny1-WEB.jpg (28050 bytes)

P9030006.JPG (347690 bytes)

thepit3A-WEB.jpg (4652 bytes)

Edwin3.jpg (25076 bytes)

PALM.jpg (218872 bytes)

vet.jpg (13355 bytes)

Wolfgang's Vault 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RISESMART_120x600.jpg (44569 bytes)

l     Contact      l     SOV Archives     l      SOV Blog     l     SOV Facebook     l     SOV Myspace     l      SOV Network      l     SOV Youtube    l